Monday, November 23, 2020

Increased‌ ‌Remote‌ ‌Work‌ ‌Should‌ ‌Have‌ ‌Little‌ ‌Impact‌ ‌on‌ ‌Workers’‌ ‌Compensation‌ ‌Coverage‌ ‌

As more employees work from home in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, employers and workers are considering the implications for workers’ compensation claims, because accidents can happen at home as easily as in the traditional workplace.

As stated by Insurance Business America, home-based employees have the same workers’ compensation benefits as office employees do.

Little should change in terms of workers’ compensation coverage if employees begin working from home, or “telecommuting.” If you have been working from home and have been injured in an accident while performing work duties and cannot work, you may be entitled to workers’ compensation just as if you had been injured in an office or on the job at a construction site.

In the Raleigh, N.C., area, the workers’ compensation attorneys at Younce, Vtipil, Baznik & Banks, P.A., can help you seek the full benefits available by law after a serious on-the-job injury. At the first sign that your employer or their workers’ compensation insurer is disputing your claim for benefits, contact a Raleigh workers’ comp lawyer at Younce, Vtipil, Baznik & Banks at 919-661-9000 or online for a free, no-obligation case review.

More Employees Have Been Working from Home

While coronavirus concerns have increased the number of people working from home, telecommuting is not a sudden 2020 trend. Before we were forced to work remotely, many industries were offering “work from home” days to help their employees achieve a better work-life balance, says Employment Hero, a human resources management services provider. At the same time, the rise of the gig economy has necessitated home offices for many workers.

In 2017, 3.9 million U.S. employees, or 2.9 percent of the total U.S. workforce, worked from home at least half of the time, up from 1.8 million in 2005, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

But, in August 2020, 24 percent of people who were employed worked from home because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the BLS says. That was down from 35 percent in May, the first month that data specific to the pandemic was collected.

Not All Jobs Suitable for Work-from-Home Arrangements

Another BLS study found that 63 percent of U.S. jobs require significant onsite presence, and the remaining 37 percent can be performed entirely at home. Examples of jobs likely to be unsuitable for telework are jobs that involve operating specific equipment or interacting face-to-face with the public.

During the pandemic, more jobs were lost among those that do not translate to telecommuting arrangements than among those that could shift to home work.

Workers with less education tend to be in jobs in which working at home is less feasible. Teleworking is also less feasible in part-time jobs and in jobs found in nonmetropolitan areas.

The BLS says working at home is generally more feasible in management, professional and administrative support jobs and in the information, financial activities, professional and business services and public administration sectors.

Working from home is less feasible in most transportation and production jobs and in the leisure and hospitality, agriculture, and construction industries, the BLS says.

The BLS predicts that telecommuting will increase as workers and employers become more comfortable with telework arrangements. Some of the world’s largest tech companies have already said they are in no hurry to repopulate offices and that working from home will be a permanent option.

Employers’ Responsibilities for Employees Working from Home

The increase in work from home during the 2020 pandemic prompted the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) to issue a bulletin reaffirming that an employer is obligated to pay for all of the time that an employee works, including telework and remote work.

“An employer is required to pay its employees for all hours worked, including work not requested but suffered or permitted, including work performed at home,” the bulletin says. “If the employer knows or has reason to believe that work is being performed, the time must be counted as hours worked.”

Just as remote work does not alter salary and wage obligations, work based at home does not change North Carolina employers’ duty to provide workers’ compensation insurance to employees and to pay benefits to injured employees. Most North Carolina businesses that employ at least three workers must carry workers’ compensation insurance to protect all full-time and part-time employees in the event of an work-related injury or illness. Employment status is the deciding factor, not location.

Independent contractors are not employees, so they are not covered by workers’ compensation benefits. But some companies will try to classify employees as contactors to avoid obligations to them, such as providing workers’ comp.

There are specific tests to apply to properly classify a work-for-pay arrangement but, in general, independent contractors set their own hours, provide their own tools, equipment and workspace, and determine whether to accept assigned tasks and how they will be handled and finished.

If you are receiving close supervision or direction, it may be that you should be classified as an employee, regardless of where you work.

Were You Injured While Working?

The main question for an employee seeking workers’ compensation benefits is, were you on the job when you were hurt? If your workers’ comp claim is challenged, a court would want to see evidence that your injury did in fact “arise out of” your job duties.

For a telecommuter, the distinction between work life and personal life can blur. This might allow an employer to challenge a work-at-home injury, such as, for example, if you fell out of your office chair as you turned to speak to your child. Further, there is no co-worker or security camera to confirm you were working at the time of the accident.

However, courts are increasingly deciding that an injury should be considered to arise out of employment if general conditions of the job put the individual in a position that he or she could be injured by a neutral risk, such as the risk of falling. In other cases, courts have found that being injured in activities incidental to work duties, such as slipping and falling while going to get a cup or coffee, qualify for workers’ comp, as well.

Contact a Raleigh Attorney About A Challenged Workers’ Comp Claim

As our work lives change, the technicalities of how the law applies to our lives is likely to change as well. But the letter and spirt of the law remain: if you are injured while on the job, then you may be entitled to claim workers’ compensation payments for your medical bills and to replace a portion of lost wages while you recover.

It will cost you nothing to discuss your legal options with an experienced North Carolina workers’ compensation attorney at Younce, Vtipil, Baznik & Banks, P.A., in Raleigh, N.C. Call us at 919-661-9000 now or contact us online for a free claim review and advice about your legal options.

The post Increased‌ ‌Remote‌ ‌Work‌ ‌Should‌ ‌Have‌ ‌Little‌ ‌Impact‌ ‌on‌ ‌Workers’‌ ‌Compensation‌ ‌Coverage‌ ‌ appeared first on .



from Younce, Vtipil & Baznik, P.A. https://www.attorneync.com/blog/increased-%e2%80%8cremote%e2%80%8c-%e2%80%8cwork%e2%80%8c-%e2%80%8c%e2%80%8c%e2%80%8cand%e2%80%8c-%e2%80%8cworkers-comp-coverage/
via https://www.attorneync.com

Thursday, November 12, 2020

Car Crash Rates Fall For Drivers In Their 70s

In what it is calling “a remarkable reversal” from a stereotype about elderly drivers being crash prone, an auto safety advocacy group says drivers in their 70s are less likely to be involved in car accidents than drivers in their prime working years.

A new study by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety says that drivers in their 70s now have fewer fatal crashes per licensed driver and fewer police-reported crashes per mile traveled than middle-aged drivers.

“Historically, older drivers were more likely to crash than other age groups, and they were less likely to survive if they did crash,” a news release about the study says.

In fact, fatal crashes involving older drivers peaked at more than 4,800 in 1997.

As the number of drivers in their 70s has increased in the last two decades, better health, safer vehicles, and possibly infrastructure improvements and changes to licensing policies, have prevented a corresponding increase in car accidents.

Healthier older drivers are less likely to crash because the onset of problems like failing eyesight and impaired cognitive function is delayed, IIHS says. Seniors who are in better shape are also more likely to survive if they do crash.

The trend could become even clearer over the next few years, suggests Jessica Cicchino, IIHS vice president for research and a co-author of “Continued trends in older driver crash involvement rates in the United States: data through 2017–2018.”

“Older adults hold onto their vehicles longer, so it takes longer for them to reap the benefits of (vehicle) safety advancements,” she says in the report. “That means we’re likely to see survival rates continue to improve as these advancements work their way into the U.S. fleet.”

Fatal Car Accidents Among Middle-Aged and Elderly Drivers

Unfortunately, the rate of fatal car accidents overall has been increasing over the last decade.

Since the peak of car accident fatalities among older drivers in 1997, the numbers have been lower, even with vast increases in the number of older drivers and the miles they drive. But a reversal began in 2010, with car accident fatalities increasing among all ages.

“Fatal crash involvement rates per mile traveled and per licensed driver have remained relatively stable in recent years among older drivers, but this is a marked contrast to what has been seen with middle-aged drivers, whose fatal and total crash involvement rates have spiked,” the study says.

The rates of fatal crashes among middle-aged drivers fatal crash and police-reported crash involvement rates per vehicle mile traveled now surpass those for drivers ages 70–79.

For the new study, IIHS researchers compared trends among drivers 70 and over with drivers ages 35-54, looking at fatal crash involvement per 100,000 licensed drivers and per vehicle mile traveled, police-reported crash involvements per vehicle mile traveled, and the number of driver deaths per 1,000 police-reported crashes.

For drivers 70 and over, fatal crash rates per licensed driver fell 43 percent from 1997 to 2018, compared with a decline of 21 percent for drivers ages 35-54. However, virtually all those reductions occurred during the first half of the study period. More recently, fatal crash involvements per driver remained steady for older drivers, while those of middle-aged drivers increased, the report says.

The rates of fatal crashes and police-reported crashes rose substantially for middle-aged drivers in recent years and declined for drivers 70 and over. As a result, septuagenarians had fewer police-reported crashes per mile than middle-aged drivers for the first time in 2017.

Cicchino says time on the road, speeding and alcohol-impaired driving, all of which increase with economic growth, typically lead to more car accident fatalities. This might help explain the difference between older and middle-aged drivers, since older drivers engage in these risky behaviors less frequently.

The IIHS says that a total of 4,973 people ages 70 and older died in motor vehicle crashes in 2018. This is 15 percent fewer than in 1997, when deaths peaked, even though the population of people 70 and older rose.

The results of the study show that fatal crashes involving older adults remain lower than the peak levels in the mid-1990s. Even with the increasing proportion of older drivers on the roads, there has not been an increase in fatal crash rates among older drivers.

Risk of Car Accidents Among the Elderly

Despite the positive trends uncovered in the latest study, age does eventually adversely affect driving ability, according to research cited by the IIHS:

  • Specific physical, cognitive and visual abilities may decline with advancing age for some people and are associated with increased risk of crash involvement.
  • Many older drivers take medications, which can impair driving ability at any age.
  • Failure to yield the right-of-way is the most common error by seniors involved in crashes. In serious crashes, the most frequent error made by older drivers is inadequate surveillance, which includes looking but not seeing and failing to look.
  • Compared with younger drivers, senior drivers are more likely to be involved in certain types of collisions — angle crashes, overtaking or merging crashes, and especially intersection crashes.
  • Generally, older drivers tend to be aware of their limitations and make adjustments to limit the type of driving they do. But some, including some who have high levels of cognitive impairment, do not adjust their driving.

Contact a Car Accident Attorney

The Insurance Institute study is encouraging news, but accidents can happen to people of any age.

If you are injured by another motorist in a collision, you can hold the negligent driver accountable for your medical bills and other expenses. In Raleigh, N.C., our car accident attorneys at Younce, Vtipil, Baznik & Banks, P.A., can help you obtain compensation to put your life back together if you have been seriously injured in a car accident someone else caused.

Contact us today at 919-661-9000 or online to schedule a free consultation about your legal options if you have been in a car accident.

The post Car Crash Rates Fall For Drivers In Their 70s appeared first on .



from Younce, Vtipil & Baznik, P.A. https://www.attorneync.com/blog/car-crash-rates-fall-for-drivers-in-their-70s/
via https://www.attorneync.com